How to reduce employee turnover: retention strategies that start with the hire


If you want to know how to reduce employee turnover, start earlier than most retention advice does: with the hire. People who fit the role, were sold an honest version of the job and got a proper start are far more likely to stay.
Perks, pizza Fridays and employee recognition programs help at the margins. They won’t fix a hire who was wrong for the role on day one.
Getting it wrong costs real money, and the cost of employee turnover adds up fast. Gallup estimates that replacing an individual employee can cost anywhere from one-half to two times their annual salary (Gallup, 2019).
A lot of that high voluntary turnover is avoidable, too. In Gallup’s 2024 follow-up, 42% of employees who left voluntarily said their manager or organization could have done something to keep them, and 45% said nobody had talked with them about their future in their last three months (Gallup, 2024).
The timing matters. As of late 2025, 51% of US employees were either actively looking for a new job or watching for openings (Gallup, 2026).
Below are practical ways to reduce employee turnover at your organization, a hiring lens on each one, and how to measure quality of hire so you know whether any of it is paying off.
Why is reducing employee turnover important?
Every exit costs one-half to two times that person’s salary and hands their work to the people still there. In a market where openings outnumber the unemployed, each avoidable departure is expensive and slow to fix.
High employee turnover drains employee morale long before anyone runs the numbers. Every exit reopens a role, stretches the remaining team members and puts the manager back in interviews instead of leading, and stretched people become more likely to leave too.
There’s plenty of movement nationally. In July 2026, the Bureau of Labor Statistics counted 3.1 million quits and 5.1 million total separations, a monthly separations rate of 3.2% (BLS, 2026).
In the Treasure Valley, that churn happens in a tight pool. The Boise metro labor force was 457,514 people in 2025, and the metro was the 13th fastest growing in the US from 2023 to 2024, according to the Boise Valley Economic Partnership.
Idaho had 0.8 unemployed people for every job opening in December 2025, against 1.1 nationally, so the top talent you want to keep has options (BLS, 2026). In a market like this, every avoidable exit is expensive.
What is the employee turnover rate by industry?
The BLS quits rate is a monthly figure, so multiply by 12 for a rough annual voluntary-turnover rate. In 2025 the US averaged 2.0% a month, about 24% a year (BLS, 2026). Idaho ran 2.5% a month, about 30% a year (BLS, 2026).
| Industry | BLS annual average quits rate, 2025 (per month) | Approximate annual voluntary turnover (x12) |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation and food services | 4.2% | ~50% |
| Retail trade | 2.6% | ~31% |
| Professional and business services | 2.3% | ~28% |
| Health care and social assistance | 2.0% | ~24% |
| Construction | 1.8% | ~22% |
| Manufacturing | 1.4% | ~17% |
| Finance and insurance | 1.3% | ~16% |
| Government | 0.8% | ~10% |
| United States, all industries | 2.0% | ~24% |
| Idaho, all industries (not seasonally adjusted) | 2.5% | ~30% |
Source: BLS JOLTS Table 22, 2025 annual averages by industry (BLS, 2026), and BLS State JOLTS Table 18 for Idaho (BLS, 2026). The BLS “annual average” quits rate is an average monthly rate, so the x12 column is an approximation. Quits count voluntary departures only; total separations, which add layoffs and other exits, run higher.
So, is 20% high? It depends which turnover you mean: in 2025 US voluntary turnover ran about 24% a year, and total separations averaged 3.3% a month, roughly 40% a year (BLS, 2026). Twenty percent voluntary turnover is around average for most industries, above government, finance and manufacturing, and well below hospitality.
Idaho’s quits rate has run above the US rate every year since 2021, falling from 3.5% a month in 2021 to 2.5% in 2025 while the US went from 2.7% to 2.0% (BLS, 2026). For the Mountain West reader, the 2025 neighbors were Montana 2.6%, Wyoming 2.5%, Utah 2.2%, Colorado 2.1% and Nevada 2.0%.
Compare your overall turnover with your own row, not the total. The rows we see most in our searches are professional and business services, construction, manufacturing and health care, and a company whose level of turnover sits well above its row usually has a hiring problem before it has a retention problem.
Why do employees leave?
Pay, no path to advance and feeling disrespected top the reasons people give when they leave their job. In Idaho, seven in 10 exits are started by the employee, and job switching is the leading cause.
In the largest public survey of people who quit, Pew found 63% cited low pay, 63% no opportunities for advancement and 57% feeling disrespected as reasons for leaving (Pew, 2022). Most people named more than one.

Ask leavers what would have kept them and the manager shows up fast. In Gallup’s 2024 research, pay and benefits came first at 30%, better manager interactions second at 21%, then organizational issues (13%), career advancement (11%) and staffing and workload (9%) (Gallup, 2024). Gallup has long found that managers account for at least 70% of the variance in employee engagement (Gallup, 2015).
Idaho follows the same pattern. In the state’s 2025 Business Climate Survey, over seven in 10 employers said turnover was initiated by the employee, and job switching was the top reason, more than double retirement or personal reasons (Idaho DOL, 2026). Only 13% of departures were employer-initiated.
What this means for the hire
In our searches, the poor hires we see most often come from leaning too hard on surface-level qualifications. A resume can show the right title, years and industry and still not tell you whether someone will succeed in your role.
Good matching goes deeper. It weighs communication style, manager fit, pace, sense of purpose and long-term potential alongside experience.
When a client brings us a role with high turnover, one that has turned over more than once, we start by asking what the last two people had in common, and it is rarely the skills. Usually the job was sold as one thing and turned out to be another, or the manager’s style never came up in the interview.
When those details are part of the search, the shortlist gets stronger and you get far fewer regrets six months in.
Why do new hires leave in the first 90 days?
Most new hires decide fast: in a BambooHR survey, 70% knew within the first month whether the job was the right fit, and 29% knew within the first week (BambooHR, 2023). They leave when the job they were sold does not match the job they got.
Retention starts with how clearly you define the role, how honestly you describe it and how well you understand who succeeds on your team. Only 47% of US employees strongly agree they know what is expected of them at work (Gallup, 2025).
That’s a hiring problem as much as a management one. If the job description is vague, the interview can’t test for it and new staff members can’t hit it.
Honest previews help. A summary of four meta-analyses on realistic job previews found small but consistent gains in how long people stay, especially in complex roles, and previews delivered shortly after hire worked slightly better than those given before (QIC-WD, 2020).
Before we open a search, we work through with the client what a good first 90 days looks like in outcomes rather than duties. That list becomes the job description, the interview scorecard and the plan for day one, so the person who accepts the offer has already seen the job they will do. Keeping good people is rarely luck. It’s usually the result of better alignment between the person, the role and the team.

What are the best employee retention strategies?
Clear expectations, good managers, a structured first 90 days, room to grow, fair pay and recognition. All of them work better when you hire the right person first, so each one below starts at the hire instead of the exit interview.
- Write a job description that matches the real job. List the outcomes you expect in the first 90 days, not a wish list, so new employees don’t discover a different job from the one they were sold.
- Hire for fit, not just the resume. Look for the right skills, then test for communication style, pace and how someone handles your real work environment.
- Tell the truth in the interview. Share the hard parts, like workload, work hours, travel and the manager’s style. Realistic job previews produce small but consistent retention gains, most of all in complex roles (QIC-WD, 2020).
- Build an onboarding process with a plan. A first-week schedule, a named buddy to help them build connections and clear 30, 60 and 90 day goals give new hires a sense of belonging fast.
- Help managers lead well. Gallup’s 2025 survey found only 32% of US employees were engaged in their work, and managers shape most of the employee experience (Gallup, 2025). Regular one-to-ones, transparent communication and an inclusive culture with real psychological safety are where it starts.
- Offer real development opportunities. In the same survey, only 31% of employees strongly agreed someone at work encourages their development, so visible career development paths and real learning and development give good people a reason to grow within the company instead of outside it (Gallup, 2025).
- Pay fairly, recognize often and stay flexible. Benchmark salaries against local data, build a culture of recognition by rewarding employees so they feel appreciated, ask for employee feedback, and offer flexible work schedules and real work-life balance where the role allows. Among leavers, Gallup found pay and benefits was the top thing that would have kept them, at 30%, well ahead of staffing and workload at 9% (Gallup, 2024).
None of these strategies to reduce employee turnover is exotic. Companies that reduce turnover simply do these things consistently, build a culture around them, and start with number one.

Pay deserves a local note. Average annual wages were $70,582 in Ada County and $51,909 in Canyon County in 2024, so an offer that works in Nampa may not land in downtown Boise (BVEP, 2025).
BLS published wages put Boise about 7.5 percent below the US mean ($31.02 against $33.54 an hour), but Ada County wages are rising about twice as fast as the US and unemployment is low (BLS OEWS, 2026) (BLS QCEW, 2026). Add the finding from the Idaho Department of Labor that job switching was the top reason for turnover in 2025, and a stale salary band is the easiest way to lose someone to the employer down the road.
How do you measure quality of hire?
Quality of hire measures how much value a new employee brings, judged by performance, ramp-up time and whether they are still there at 12 months. Pick two or three measures and track them for every hire.
It’s the metric that ties recruiting to how long people stay. If quality of hire is low, no amount of engagement work downstream will fully make up for it.
We advise clients to prioritize some mix of these:
- First-year stay rate: are new hires still here after 12 months?
- Hiring manager satisfaction at the 90-day mark
- Ramp-up time for each role
- Performance ratings in the first review cycle
We also advise a check-in at the 90-day mark and again near the first anniversary, because those are the two points where a mismatch, or quiet plans to leave, tends to show. A benchmark you really measure beats a perfect metric you never look at.
Why internal hiring sometimes falls short
Your HR professionals and hiring managers know your company and culture better than anyone, but hiring competes with the day job. When screening, scheduling and follow-ups get squeezed, quality drops with them.
The pattern we see most often is not a bad decision but a slow one. The shortlist sits for two weeks, the best candidate takes another offer, and the role goes to whoever is still available.
If you’re weighing whether to keep hiring in-house or bring in help, our guide to internal vs external recruitment walks through the trade-offs.
What does a structured hiring process look like?
A defined scorecard, the same core questions for every candidate, fast feedback and one owner for communication. Structure fixes most of what separates a hire that sticks from a hire that gets repeated.
Hiring gets frustrating when the process feels scattered. One person reviews resumes, another books interviews late, and nobody is quite sure what the role needs.

Candidates notice. By the time they reach an offer, the process already feels inconsistent, which hurts hiring quality and their first impression of you.
An outside recruiter can help here. A good partner defines the role with you, screens properly and keeps things moving so you can focus on the hiring decision.

How much does employee turnover cost?
Replacing one employee costs one-half to two times their annual salary (Gallup, 2019). At the Ada County average wage of $70,582, that is roughly $35,000 to $141,000 per exit before you count the lost momentum (BVEP, 2025).
There’s the obvious cost of replacing an employee, then the hit to productivity and morale, the frustrated team and the extra management time. The longer the role was open, the more painful starting over becomes.
Local pay matters here too. BLS published wages put Boise about 7.5 percent below the US mean ($31.02 against $33.54 an hour), but with Ada County wages rising about twice as fast as the US and unemployment low, the price of a replacement is climbing faster here than in most of the country (BLS OEWS, 2026) (BLS QCEW, 2026).
If you want to put numbers on it, our breakdown of the true cost of a bad hire is a good place to start.
Hiring once is almost always cheaper than hiring twice.
Candidate experience shapes retention too
Potential employees form opinions about you long before they’re hired. A clear, respectful process builds the trust a new hire starts with, and a messy one plants the doubt that surfaces in month three.
They notice communication, interview flow and whether you seem organized. A messy process creates doubt, and a clear one builds trust.
People who feel informed and valued during the search usually start with more confidence and commitment. It doesn’t guarantee they’ll stay, but it’s a much stronger starting point.
It’s also how you build the reputation that helps you attract and retain high-performing employees. In a market the size of Boise, candidates talk to each other.
When outside hiring help makes sense
You don’t need outside help for every hire. It earns its fee when roles are hard to fill, growth is moving fast, your team is stretched or a run of hires hasn’t stuck.
RNG Group has placed full-time, permanent, direct-hire professional and leadership roles across Idaho and the Mountain West since 2015, and we don’t do temp, contract or temp-to-hire staffing. If you’re not sure how that differs, here’s our explainer on what direct hire is and when it fits.
Hiring locally? Our Boise recruiters know the market and the people in it, and we’ll tell you honestly whether a role needs a search or a better job description.
Frequently asked questions
How do you calculate employee turnover rate?
Divide the number of employees who left during a period by your average headcount for that period, then multiply by 100. If 6 people left and you averaged 60 employees, your turnover is 10%.
Is 20% employee turnover high?
It depends on which turnover you are measuring and which industry you are in. In 2025, US voluntary turnover ran about 24% a year (BLS, 2026). Total separations ran about 40%, so 20% voluntary turnover is around average for most industries, though above government, finance and manufacturing (BLS, 2026).
How high is employee turnover in Idaho?
Idaho’s quits rate averaged 2.5% a month in 2025, about 30% a year, against 2.0% nationally (BLS, 2026). It has run above the US rate every year since 2021.
Is most employee turnover preventable?
A large share of it is. In Gallup’s 2024 research, 42% of people who left voluntarily said their manager or organization could have prevented it, and 45% said no one had discussed their satisfaction, performance or future with them in their last three months (Gallup, 2024).
Final thoughts
Hiring quality and how long people stay are tightly linked, so leaders must treat them as one problem. If your process is rushed, vague or resume-deep, turnover gets more likely; if it’s built around hiring the right person for the right team, you end up with happy employees who are far more likely to stay.
Want to know where your hiring process is leaking people? Take the Hiring Health Scorecard to see where you stand before the next role opens.
Filed under: Recruiting




